Wikivoyage:WTS archive/Pub (temporary refuge)/Pub (temporary refuge)/Files by user reviewed

User list
List "Files by user X" below that have been reviewed for FOP/licensing issues, and have been properly tagged:
 * [Moved to table below by me --MGA73 (talk) 20:00, 13 December 2012 (CET)


 * Category:Files uploaded by Albion checked by Ymblanter. Should we add it to the table?--Ymblanter (talk) 15:19, 5 December 2012 (CET)
 * When I added the table I thought it could replace this manual list (like on Shared http://wikivoyage-old.org/shared/Wikivoyage:Lounge#Checked_usercategories ). The table makes it easy to see if files have been transferred and if there ia only a few files in the category then there was a problem and the files should be checked again. For example no license or author is not the same as on the other files or it is not own work. --MGA73 (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2012 (CET)
 * Thanks, added it to the table--Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 5 December 2012 (CET)
 * Actually I was thinking that when a few more of the categories were done then it could be interessting to put all files with a Information template and a Move template in a separate category and move all those files. The bot can make a better result when there is an information template on the file. Especially if it is not own work by the uploader. --MGA73 (talk) 17:47, 5 December 2012 (CET)


 * Category:Files uploaded by MartinTheExplorer - 3 unsourced photos, taken on 12, 13 and 14 July and uploaded on 14 July. Would it be safe to assume own work? It won't be easy to steal three images in so short time. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:53, 29 December 2012 (CET)

Maybe you could make a decision on whether we could assume that some unsourced works are own works?
 * Category:Files uploaded by Kodaikun: 6 images. One sourced with "PD-self", the rest of them unsourced. All taken using the same camera model and most uploaded on the day they were taken.
 * Category:Files uploaded by Skysoblue: 4 images, 2 without licence, all taken using the same camera model, not taken during the same year as they were uploaded. It says that the original creator has released two of the images to the public domain, but it doesn't say who the original creator is.
 * Category:Files uploaded by Elgaard: 3 images, taken about a week before they were uploaded. Uploader seems reliable and has uploaded lots of other images which have been moved to Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 31 December 2012 (CET)


 * I think it is ok to asume own if there is a PD-self and no indications it is not own work. If the uploader has a "no-name username" (like "MGA73" for example or "Travel Freak") and all or most uploads are credited to the same person then I also think we could asume own if we can find no indications that the username does not match. For example if userpage says "I'm a guy from Denmark" and the name credited is a female name. --MGA73 (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2013 (CET)
 * Most of these have "PD-author", not "PD-self". PD-self means that the images were released to the public domain and that the uploader is the author, whereas PD-author tells that the images were released to the public domain without telling who the author is. One has PD-self, so that one is sourced. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:13, 2 January 2013 (CET)

Archive
The following categories are empty because all files in them have been moved to Commons or tagged with a "don't move" template. They are kept here because there are discussions related to the categories.


 * Category:Files uploaded by SnappyHip
 * This category contains a lot of files from Flickr. Wouldn't it be better to move those to Category:Files from Flickr - mtc candidates instead? --Stefan2 (talk) 19:23, 28 November 2012 (CET)
 * Yes. I just moved all with a local review and I was wondering if it would be good to do a search and move all files that have the word "flickr" in the description to a Flickr category. Then it is easier to check them. Ofcourse we do not need to add files with a NowCommons etc. to that category. Only files with a move or untagged. --MGA73 (talk) 21:22, 28 November 2012 (CET)
 * Will try to move files to Category:Files from Flickr to check so we can see. --MGA73 (talk) 21:38, 28 November 2012 (CET)
 * How should I handle this in the future? --Peter Talk 23:14, 28 November 2012 (CET)
 * We need to check all the files one by one to see if there is a working link to the file on Flickr and if the license is still ok. If not then we should add an ignore - or the missing link :-) . I took a few filed but it is time to go to bed. My plan was to move more files tomorrow. --MGA73 (talk) 23:46, 28 November 2012 (CET)
 * The category Category:Files from Flickr to check has been checked by me. Please make a decision about three images (see below) and then import the rest. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:48, 29 November 2012 (CET)


 * Category:Files uploaded by Shaund - Also, when you're done, please run wikipedia:Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MGA73bot 3 on Shared. I checked this category because I had found a couple of images on Shared which had been copied to Shared from here. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:36, 28 November 2012 (CET)
 * Bot is running. It is easier to see if some files were not copied if your bot removes the files with ignore, nowcommons and keeplocal :-) --MGA73 (talk) 17:32, 28 November 2012 (CET)
 * My bot will remove those categories eventually. My plan is to run it more or less constantly to update categories based on recent tagging activity, but right now it's switched off. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:40, 28 November 2012 (CET)
 * Okay. Removed them myself. It seems that there is some Flickr files among the files that was not moved. --MGA73 (talk) 18:04, 28 November 2012 (CET)
 * My bot is running now, but as usual, it will automatically stop if your bot runs so that your tasks aren't slowed down. Expect a full run to take 30 hours or so. Maybe I should also tell the bot to remove "Move" if the file has any of "NowCommons", "KeepLocal" or "Ignore". --Stefan2 (talk) 19:18, 28 November 2012 (CET)
 * It seems that my bot really do not care if your bot is also running. I counted the first edits made when your bot was still running and I can see no improvement in speed after your bot stops. Since your bot and my bot does 95 % of the edits at the moment we do not slow down that many other users so I think it is safe for you to increse the speed. You could try full speed for 15 minutes and see if you slow anything down. --MGA73 (talk) 20:52, 28 November 2012 (CET)


 * Category:Files from Flickr to check - Please make a decision about File:Millenium Park.jpg (can't tell if it's an artwork or a building or what it is supposed to be), File:Sakhalin-gray-whale-small.jpg (very small & no EXIF: copyvio?) & File:Palm tree at the Cantina Marina.jpg (artwork or real palm?). After that, import the rest. To make it easier to check the category, I removed all KeepLocal, Ignore & NowCommons files by bot from that category. I also removed a couple of other files where the decision on what to do might need a decision on Commons, but I didn't tag those files in any way. Also, are these all files which contain the word "Flickr" without containing NowCommons, KeepLocal or Ignore? --Stefan2 (talk) 00:48, 29 November 2012 (CET)
 * Cool. Thank you. I think we should copy them all. Then we can get a license review on Commons and have the discussion there. The palm was there allready. --MGA73 (talk) 08:31, 29 November 2012 (CET)
 * All on Commons now. But I found a tricky one File:Binhai Lu.jpg. It looks like the file from Flickr but it is not excactly the same file. Uploader probably copied the wrong link but the files are very similar so I just uploaded the one from Flickr.
 * Ah, sorry, I thought that it was the same but cropped and edited, but looking at the file resolution on Flickr, I see that this isn't the case. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:14, 29 November 2012 (CET)
 * Well who cares :-) Only thing that would have happend is that a reviewer on Commons would have failed it :-)
 * Anyway I made a typo in the script so not all files ended in Category:Files from Flickr to check. Turns out the bot does what I tell it to do. Not what i wanted it to do :-D --MGA73 (talk) 11:18, 29 November 2012 (CET)
 * Category checked again. It should be safe now. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:47, 29 November 2012 (CET)
 * Thank you. Moved the files except one that should be moved woth Ogre's tool. --MGA73 (talk) 16:59, 29 November 2012 (CET)


 * Category:Files uploaded by PerryPlanet - there's just one image I want to flag -- File:SLC mainlibrary.jpg -- it's the interior of a building with a bit of artwork, but I think it's OK FoP-wise. -Shaund (talk) 05:39, 30 November 2012 (CET)
 * The interior is fine and covered under FOP. The artwork is likely de minimis, but that would have to be hashed out on Commons.  If someone objects, they can nominate it for deletion.  LtPowers (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2012 (CET)
 * Category:Files uploaded by Ypsilonatshared, but make a decision about the images below:
 * File:Annemasse town hall.JPG & File:Annemasse railway station.JPG: Two French buildings from the 1880s. Architects unknown. Buildings from the 1880s are usually OK, but you never know.
 * File:Eduskuntatalo Helsinki.JPG: Sculpture is by wikipedia:Wäinö Aaltonen, but maybe you could argue that the photo focuses on the building and that the statue is de minimis?
 * File:Mannerheimstatue Kiasma.JPG: Same situation as the above, except that I haven't identified the sculptor.
 * Two images (I think) were copied from elsewhere, for example one from the user listed immediately below. Will your bot detect those and skip them? They don't mention the uploader's user name. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:32, 1 December 2012 (CET)
 * Highly unlikely Commons would object to French buildings over 100 years old. Sure, in theory the architect might have been born in 1850 and died in 1950, but sometimes we just have to take a chance.  I would be wary of the Helsinki statue, but I agree the Kiasma statue is de minimis.  LtPowers (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2012 (CET)


 * Category:Files uploaded by Inas - Problem: The vast majority of the images have, but also "author: NA" or "author: no credit needed" or similar. Assume own work or Commons:Template:No source since? --Stefan2 (talk) 15:03, 1 December 2012 (CET)
 * perhaps it is a result of conversion to Information template. Example: this edit where it said "Credit: none" and now it says "Author: none". So I would asume own work. --MGA73 (talk) 15:33, 1 December 2012 (CET)
 * Yes, I believe Inas thought the "Credit" line was for "how do you want to be credited"; the "PD-self" tag should be seen as definitive regarding authorship. Or you could ask him.  =)  LtPowers (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2012 (CET)


 * Category:Files uploaded by Morocco - and note that "撮影者：本人" means "Photographer: Myself". --Stefan2 (talk) 15:52, 1 December 2012 (CET)
 * Most of the files are now on Commons. The remaing files do not have a license or I'm not sure if it is own work. Can you have a look? --MGA73 (talk) 19:08, 1 December 2012 (CET)
 * Marked the last one as "no permission". At some point, we need to check those again and try to contact the users to see if we can get source, licence and permission. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:52, 1 December 2012 (CET)
 * Yep... It was perhaps not very clear but I meant that all of the categories above was checked and the remaining files in them ... :-) --MGA73 (talk) 20:03, 1 December 2012 (CET)
 * I'd concentrate on categories with more files for the moment. There are only a few files by these users left. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:26, 1 December 2012 (CET)
 * Okay :-) --MGA73 (talk) 21:33, 1 December 2012 (CET)


 * Category:Files uploaded by Haem85 was marked as tagged. Anyone know if Carson Maynard = (WT-shared) Carson Maynard = (WT-shared) Haem85? --MGA73 (talk) 19:13, 1 December 2012 (CET)
 * Check the link for File:MI AnnArbor DawnTreader.jpg. It says (WT-shared) Carson Maynard as author. Also note that the text "(WT-shared) " was added by a bot when the site was migrated from USA to Germany. Users haven't been typing in this themselves; the user typed in this as Carson Maynard . This seems to confirm that Carson Maynard = Haem85. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:23, 1 December 2012 (CET)
 * Thank you. Moved the files. --MGA73 (talk) 21:33, 1 December 2012 (CET)


 * Category:Files uploaded by Sergey kudryavtsev --Peter Talk 19:20, 3 December 2012 (CET)
 * One thing I worry about are Sergey's icon uploads—should we put a category on those now? Category:Wikivoyage icons or something like that? --Peter Talk 19:20, 3 December 2012 (CET)
 * This one perhaps Commons:Category:Wikivoyage_map_icons ? --MGA73 (talk) 20:16, 3 December 2012 (CET)
 * They're actually for use in templates, not maps. --Peter Talk 20:27, 3 December 2012 (CET)
 * Okay then it is in Commons:Category:Wikivoyage_icons --MGA73 (talk) 21:02, 3 December 2012 (CET)
 * - but first make a decision about : there is no entry Commons:COM:FOP. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:04, 3 December 2012 (CET)
 * That file is not in use, and is already available on Commons as Commons:File:AbujaNationalMosque.jpg. --Peter Talk 02:54, 3 December 2012 (CET)
 * --Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 3 December 2012 (CET)
 * --Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 3 December 2012 (CET)
 * http://en.wikivoyage-old.org/wiki/Category:Files_from_Flickr_to_check --Stefan2 (talk) 10:58, 4 December 2012 (CET)
 * http://www.wikivoyage-old.org/shared/Category:Images_by_Pedelecs --Stefan2 (talk) 13:14, 5 December 2012 (CET)
 * Category:Files from world66 to check - Also remember to use Commons:Template:Cc-world66 and see Travellers' pub and note that you transferred a lot of World66 files to Commons with misattribution to User:(WT-shared) Gobbler. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:07, 4 December 2012 (CET)
 * Yes I transferred most of the files to Commons and requested a licensereview. Also see this comment. I hoped that users on Commons would check and fix so a handfull of users here do not have to check all. --MGA73 (talk) 09:26, 4 December 2012 (CET)