User talk:Yogaeessence01

I'm pretty sure I remember you editing before, and not in a good way. Pinging. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk | contributions ) 03:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, you've been blocked before. That was an indefinite block. I will apply the same thing now. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk | contributions ) 03:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, because you have edited in the violation of WV:Tout, I will add your company URL to the blacklist, so you can't add the URL to the article again, and also I've protected the Rishikesh article so new users can't edit it. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk | contributions ) 03:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't indefblock and actually didn't block at all, because it was only one edit. See User talk:Yoga Essence. Somehow, User:AndreCarrotflower determined that User:Yoga Essence was a spambot, not a person touting. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I see. I think, though if this user has created 3 different accounts to add touty listings, then they have used sockpuppets, which seems worthy of at least a block, maybe an indefblock, to me. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk | contributions ) 01:38, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 3 accounts, not 2? Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe you're right, but I seem to have a vague memory of you talking to someone about their edits as being "gross touting". Was that perhaps some other version of this user, because it's the exact same thing as what led you to use the term "gross touting"? --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk | contributions ) 02:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I think it was someone else, though it's easy to confuse the sort of interchangeable touters of articles about places in India, as their styles are so similar. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:25, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I believe you're right, actually; that individual was 150.242.254.213 as I can tell. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk | contributions ) 02:57, 10 January 2019 (UTC)