User talk:Wauteurz/Luxembourg

Get in
You marked the Get in sections for some cities as 'Little content for both sections'. What more information should we add, you think? I don't think we should create long articles for the sake of it - if a town is only reachable through one highway and one train line, I don't think it makes much sense to write much more about it. What do you think? Math1985 (talk) 20:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I am aware that some places might have very straightforward ways of entering the city/commune, and that listing that in one sentence is technically sufficient to describe that. However, I personally prefer there to be some more than "X is at the end of a branch on the train route between F and G, which means that you will have to switch at Y." To sketch the image: Wiltz is rather straightforward to get to. Here I have buffed up the contents of the Get in section with ways to get in from multiple locations, preferably in opposite directions. After that, I described how the train station is at a branch-off. I then listed where the main line takes you, where you would need to switch, and how you could alternatively get into the city via bus. (Fleshing the article out is why I make By public transit sections instead of By bus and By train. To me, get in has to cover multiple ways of getting in (even though we aim to have this for guide-articles and higher), as the traveller might come from anywhere, and we try to be useful to them. Aside from that, it's my personal preference. -- Wauteurz (talk) 07:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)