User talk:89.187.78.179

Hi, how are you? Thanks for editing; your enthusiasm is appreciated. However, it looks like you've gotten yourself involved in an edit war in the Panmunjeom article. We don't tolerate edit wars on this site because they waste time and create ill feeling. If you feel strongly about an edit and it gets reverted, post to the relevant talk page - in this case, Talk:Panmunjeom - and state your case, so that we can try to reach a consensus through deliberation. If you continue to edit war, it might be necessary to temporarily suspend your account to try to stanch the disruption.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Ikan Kekek - thanks for the message. I am concerned about the actions of an editor who insists on the use of bad English and bad explanations, and their response to others attempts to improve articles is simply reverting. —The preceding comment was added by 89.187.78.145 (talk • contribs)
 * Thanks for your reply. For whatever it's worth, I don't agree with you about his English. As for substance, again, I repeat that the place to discuss it is on the talk page of each article. Even if your revision is much better than the other version, the distraction and disruption from the edit warring is not worth it, so please try for consensus, instead. And my recommendation would be for you to concentrate on specifically detailing how your edits would make the article better, not how his edits are "bad." Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Ikan Kekek. His standard of English is dreadful, and recent examples have included ending sentences with prepositions, clumsy additions in brackets and the incorrect & inaccurate use of "technical". Perhaps this is because his first language is something other than English, or perhaps he is simply young or uneducated. I make no claim to be an expert grammatician, but copy editing where it is clearly needed is a legitimate contribution. Thankfully another editor has recently made an edit using a superior standard of English, see

Conducting discussions
Hi - lets all keep the discussions about article contents on the article talk pages. That way we can forget issues with individuals, and focus on the best outcome for the travel guide. Thanks. --Inas (talk) 11:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)