User talk:70.71.87.75

Hi. You might possibly have good intentions, but this is a Wiki, not a place where you get to singlehandedly speak for the site, and if you continue edit warring, we will have to suspend your posting privileges very quickly. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Seeing how many pages you're SHOUTING on, it's necessary to block you for 2 hours, so we can revert your vandalism without trouble. Please cool off and come back with a more cooperative attitude. If you think edits to warningboxes are warranted, post your suggested rephrasings and arguments on the talk pages of the relevant articles, and wait to see if you can persuade a consensus to agree with you, but don't edit warningboxes or add more of them unilaterally. Your efforts to convince others will have a better chance if you don't yell at people or try to tell them to let you operate unilaterally. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Warningboxes
Hi. If you have substantive things to update, such as I did in mentioning the ceasefire in Yemen, go ahead, but the exact phrasings of warningboxes are not usually that important as long as they convey, with some official links, the basic whys and wherefores of reasons not to go. It's usually unnecessary to add bolding, and please do not add "Do not travel to x," because there's always the possibility of a relief worker traveling to a war zone, and besides, we assume our readers aren't idiots and can understand the risks well enough if we present a summary of them and link to official travel advisories. Thanks. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Do you want to add information that's actually helpful to travellers? So far, you've done nothing but tweak warningboxes, mostly in order to beat a dead horse. I hope we don't have to block you for ignoring your user talk page. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)