User talk:47.188.162.94

Hello, 47.188.162.94! Thank you for contributing to Wikivoyage, but please note that one or more of your recent edits has been reverted as it appeared to be an attempt to use this site to advertise or promote a business or service. Wikivoyage is created by travellers for travellers, and while business owners and employees are welcome to contribute, use of this site for promotional purposes is not allowed.

If you feel that your edits were incorrectly identified as promotional, please read Wikivoyage's guidelines on identifying promotional edits. If, after reading that guideline, you still feel your edits were incorrectly removed, please use this talk page or the talk page of the article where your edit was removed to explain why your change was not promotional. Note that it is very important that you discuss your proposed change before re-adding it since repeated promotional edits can lead to a temporary block of your account's ability to edit Wikivoyage, and in serious cases the business in question may be blacklisted from Wikivoyage.

No private company's URL should be made to stand in for an Indian government URL. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Ikan, you are giving wrong info because it is out of date. There is no 'visa on arrival' now and actually never was so that is why Indian govt has changed the name because is was misnomer. there is only eta or regular visa for tourist. You have given quote that 'no private company url should be made....' but here is quote from that private company website 'CKGS is the only authorized Service Provider for the Embassy of India and its Consulates across the USA for Visa, OCI, Renunciation of Indian Citizenship services as follows with effect from May 21, 2014.' CKGS the only company that is agent for Indian govt and the only way to get visa without using a private company that charge additional fees. Furthermore, you have incorrectly put link for eta when link should be CKGS bc you say that is link for applying for regular visa and eta is not regular visa. I put info on Wiki that is up to date, very useful and not tout! You are giving out of date incorrect info. I do not have time to be of further help. So you can persist with your misinformation. —The preceding comment was added by 47.188.162.94 (talk • contribs)


 * I appreciate your explanation. I will revert my edit. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Also, I apologize for ignorantly casting aspersions. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:42, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for consideration and realization of up-to-date information provided by me. Thank you for doing revert. My concern was to alert people there are no 'visa on arrival' and nearly everyone has to have prearranged visa otherwise they will be denied boarding at airport.

(In previous response to you I used 'eta' when I meant 'etv' but you recognized my point anyway.) BTW, map shows one blue country as 'visa on arrival' and I wonder if that is current info. IDK) —The preceding comment was added by 47.188.162.94 (talk • contribs)


 * I don't know either. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)