User talk:2601:804:201:D5C0:3D2A:4BED:AC16:B0E6

Hello, 2601:804:201:D5C0:3D2A:4BED:AC16:B0E6! Welcome to Wikivoyage.

To help get you started contributing, we've created a tips for new contributors page, full of helpful links about policies and guidelines and style, as well as some important information on copyleft and basic stuff like how to edit a page. If you need help, check out Help, or post a message in the travellers' pub.

By the way, have you considered creating an account here? While you can absolutely keep contributing as an anonymous user, it promises a bunch of benefits, and no obligations.

Thanks for your edit in the Denver article, but I don't think we should adopt the word "Latinx" here because of this:

[quote:] The term “Latinx” has been embraced by 3% of Latinos in the United States, according to the first major poll on the topic by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center, which closely tracks “Hispanic/Latino” demographic and social trends. The study, released Tuesday, also found that roughly three out of four Latinos in the U.S. hadn’t even heard of the term.[...]

Among those who had heard of Latinx, 33% said it should be used to describe the Hispanic or Latino population, while 65% said it should not be used. Researchers also found that people in the United States still prefer to self-identify as “Hispanic” (61%) followed by “Latino” (29%) or their country of origin.

Pew interviewed 3,030 U.S. Hispanic or Latino adults, ages 18 to 65 and older, in December 2019. The survey was conducted bilingually and was “nationally representative,” Pew said.[unquote]

If someone uses the term to begin with, OK, but editing Latino to Latinx is IMO not something we should be doing in a travel guide. I hope that makes sense.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)