User talk:121.217.123.228

Your edits to the City East article
Please accept my apologies for reverting your recent contribution to the Sydney/City East travel guide.

Please do not feel offended or think that I was being harsh and that your no doubt considerable effort and good will has been undone. It looks like you are new to editing here and unfortunately there are quite a lot of somewhat formulaic requirements on WT, not just for content but also in regard to where the content is positioned and structured into the article. Please be re-assured that your hard work is noticed and please do continue to contribute.

Please have another look over the article with your contribution now removed and examine in particular the Do, Parks, Sports fixtures, the introduction to Eat and Drink, and also the Stay safe section.

Don't worry it is not all deleted and lost. It remains in the WT histories and your content can be brought up again. Indeed if you look below you will find it there just as it was when you edited it today.

Your content, if suitably restructured to WT guidelines may fit into these section categories and may possibly develop this article and improve the content and information provided to readers. Just have a good look at some other well developed articles first so you can see what fits the general WT structural formula

Please do not be discouraged, just revisit the article and think about how you can improve it without putting your very nicely written and informing content into the wrong section of the article. Definetely do not put it into the orientation section as you have as without doubt another patrolling editor will probably just delete it all. Indeed that is the main problem with your recent edit and that is why I have come along and just removed the whole lot of it. I do not want to start chopping up and rewriting your contribution. You are clearly quite capable of doing that yourself and you may as well try and get the hang of it so that you can go on contributing. WT does not want to lose you. Another patrolling editor may look here on you Talk page and see that this has been explained all ready and they may possibly not even explain it to you further, they will just delete again. But please don't think that is is because your content is not acceptable or that people are just being nasty. If you need some assistance look around first at other well developed similar articles for some guidelines. Also have a look in the help areas of WT. If you think you are being treated harshly ask for one of the WT administrators to help steer you in the right direction so you can get a hang of it as quickly as possible.

What you wrote was fine, it was just incorrectly placed within the article.

Maybe try experimenting here on your talk page using it as a sandbox. I have copied the entire article With your edits as per your previous version into you talk page here so that you still have the content at hand. Don't think that everything you wrote is lost as it is all readily recallable from the histories. You can you can experiment with it here without any thing you do running up against article edit reverts from others like myself. Once you have it in good shape then have another go at putting it into the article.

To preview what you are working on just use the Preview button when in edit mode. If you are here using your Talk page to build your contribution then you can save at any time without it causing any controversy at all. So please have a look at your contributions to the article here on your Talk page first and try and rework your content so that it can be used in the article.

Please keep up the good work. (WT-en) felix 08:15, 28 September 2010 (EDT)