User talk:(WT-en) Sfcwebmaster

Sarawak weblinks
At Wikivoyage, we welcome business owners and would love to have your expertise in creating high-quality guides for destinations that you cover, but our rules for external links don't permit the kind of links you added to Sarawak and Kuching. (WT-en) Gorilla Jones 19:23, 26 September 2007 (EDT)

sarawak link
All the Sarawak national parks and Sarawak reserve centres are managed by our company; SARAWAK FORESTRY. So why can't we put the link to our website? List of Sarawak National Parks and Reserve Centres managed by SARAWAK FORESTRY


 * I think in this case, as the corporation was established by the government specifically to manage the Sarawak national parks, linking is acceptable. But first, adding a large quantity of links to one site on one article is against our Project:External links policy. Second, these kind of links may only be added as an official website, at the top of an individual park article, next to the name. We do not list website links to linked destinations in region articles. For an example of how this should be done, please see Bako_National_Park. Lastly, external links should not be front listed. They should always come after a listing. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 22:46, 1 October 2007 (EDT)

Hi Peter, thanks for the reply. I would like to know, is it ok to put each of the national park to link to our company website national park article? Like Bako NP to Bako NP, Lambir NP to Lambir NP and etc. Thanks.
 * I'm going to jump in here. It seems to me that this would be more like what we usually use as an official link. -- (WT-en) OldPine 20:48, 2 October 2007 (EDT)