User:SHB2000/sandbox/misinterpretation of user rights

Misinterpretation of a position happens, usually in discussions, however, it could also happen in editing which may result in edit warring. While some users have some privileges over others, it does not mean that a user can make their decision more valid than another user without those privileges. It's the wiki equivalent of two children where the younger child says "Your older, so that's why your saying this" while the older child mentioned nothing about their age.

Misinterpretation of user rights could also be used as a tactic to get their own way.

Examples of misinterpretation of user rights

 * When a user is arguing with an admin, and accusing the admin of abusing admin privileges
 * When a user is a well known admin or a long term wikivoyager are edit warring with a new user over incorrect information or something that is against Wikivoyage policies. It may also be about the tone or liveliness of an article.
 * When a business owner argues back aggressively when a " message has been put on their talk page, and in some cases even personal attacks
 * When a new user feels like ranting but another user may have said something rant-like.

What to do
However, if this does happens, it's best to take a step back, and let the user know in a polite and timely manner. Replying immediately often signifies aggravation, and a more timely response should be given. If the user is still adamant, take it to the next level, and be a bit more firm on the user. However, personal attacks, insults and direct swearing should be avoided at all times. Doing so is a personal attack.

It may also help to just stop the discussion, and come back a day or two later. This ensures for both the users to calm down, and not get into a pissing match.

Putting notices on pages like RfC or the Pub might get some attention, and help more users come to a consensus, rather than an ongoing endless pissing match, which doesn't help much.

Note that we believe that Wiki works, and that an open page is the best policy. Any time two or more people can't work out their differences on talk pages, in public forums like the Travellers' pub, or between themselves, we've failed. An important part of what makes Wikivoyage powerful is that we believe in working things out directly, and not a lot of hierarchical nonsense.