User:LPfi/Park status

This is a try at a new table on status criteria for Park articles, where the "informative" status would be included (it already is, but still at experimental status).

Current table (from Wikivoyage:Park article status):

The criteria seem inconsistent. I'd add "Also the criteria for a lower status need to be satisfied for a higher status."

The rationale for "informative" status was that there is too much of a gap between barely usable and next to guide status articles. Thus we would want to catch most good "usable" articles with the "informative criteria". The usable park articles are in Category:Usable parks.

The new table is below. I leave out "stub" to be left unchanged.

I think one typical way to get in is enough for usable. For big parks (think Yellowstone) there may be a huge number of typical ways to get in, so listing all is a bit much also for "informative".

A few obscure attractions shouldn't be enough for "usable", while if the park has plenty, "most" shouldn't need to be included for "informative". Changed "multiple" for guide.

Food is quite important if the park is big enough that you'd sleep there. Added to "usable", reworded for "informative".