Template talk:Link FA

Template:Link FA
Wonder if this is worth any use keeping around or can be nominated for VFD; according to the page history, it was created in January 2013 as a linkspam page by anon 94.250.60.225, then subsequently changed in September by Dekel E to resemble some of the "featured article" Wikipedia-cruft commonly found in interwiki links to featured pages in other languages. I'm vaguely aware of the policy that mandates proposing new templates before using them, but I'm not too familiar on its intricate details or indeed the venue used for discussion on and legitimization of templates. If it warrants keeping, it probably needs a serious cleanup like renaming it to "Link Star Article" or something similar. We use the "star article" system instead of "featured article", right? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)