Template talk:Boleto turistico

New Prices
Since July 1st 2008 the prices for the Boleto Turistico have risen. I got very surprised today at the entrance to Chinchero where the suddenly wanted more money. The whole boleto now costs 130 Soles and the student boleto is available for 70 soles. However, I couldn't find out whether there is any partial ticket anymore... (WT-en) Sint 22:17, 6 July 2008 (EDT) Source: http://www.boletoturisticocusco.gob.pe

What is this?
This page is a "sidebar" included via Template:sidebar in a handful of articles. So although it is Not An Article&trade;, it probably shouldn't be deleted. :) - (WT-en) Todd VerBeek 17:38, 25 May 2006 (EDT)

VFD discussion

 * Delete. - content should be moved to Cuzco and this article deleted. -- (WT-en) Tom Holland (xltel) 10:42, 4 June 2006 (EDT)
 * or if we are going with this method for sidebars, we need to add a sidebar listing page so these are not orphaned. -- (WT-en) Tom Holland (xltel) 10:47, 4 June 2006 (EDT)
 * Keep. This seems to be a valid way to include important information in multiple articles.  I agree though that some policy should probably be created, and that this sort of thing should be used sparingly.  Perhaps discuss at Project:Information boxes? -- (WT-en) Ryan 11:47, 4 June 2006 (EDT)
 * Keep. Policy discussion launched at Project:Information boxes. - (WT-en) Todd VerBeek 13:40, 4 June 2006 (EDT)
 * Delete. Not an article.  This is the kind of thing that sandboxes/graffiti walls are created for, and once something like this makes it into an actual article as an infobox, there's no longer a need for it as a stand-alone. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 10:04, 16 June 2006 (EDT)
 * Bill, I am not sure I understand you. Have you had a look at Cuzco? &mdash; (WT-en) Ravikiran 11:27, 16 June 2006 (EDT)
 * Hmmm. That's ugly, isn't it?  I still think this isn't an article, but yes, a more graceful way of dealing with the content needs to be found.  Infobox rather than sidebar, maybe? -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 11:34, 16 June 2006 (EDT)
 * I suggest we keep this and discuss the suitability, structure, layout and aesthetics on the policy page. &mdash; (WT-en) Ravikiran 11:51, 17 June 2006 (EDT)

template or article?
This is a template included in various articles, not a stand-alone article. The discussion on Project:Information boxes even calls it a template. --(WT-en) Bill in STL 21:38, 14 September 2010 (EDT)