Talk:Xaisomboun Province

''This page is for discussing the content of the corresponding article or guide. For more about using talk pages, check out Using talk pages.''

Comments
@Ibaman: Fair enough about removing the duplicate entry on Ban Naxay Savang (wasn't sure where it'd fit best), but did you have to erase all the information? Happy to reword it with your permission. If you think I'm the guy living in Ban Naxay Savang: just geolocate my IP; I'm doing this on my own accord after a 3-day motorcycle trip into the province in April. The homestay was one of the things that stood out to me on this trip, and he didn't ask for money either. Would think that information is valuable for anyone going there, especially from Vang Vieng (feel free to remove the entry from the Go Next section there if you want to make sure this article fades into obscurity, though fair enough it's probably not significant enough to be listed on the main Laos page). 197.220.163.250 19:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * With very few exceptions, virtually nothing is ever "erased" here, as articles have histories that you can see at a click. You're looking for either this or this. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * But nobody just looking for information is going to check the history. And I'm not here to revert changes, it's not my call.197.220.163.250 11:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Do you understand that what I thought you were saying is different from what you meant? It's very common for new users, often IP users, to think that a reversion causes their edits to disappear for good and all. How was I to know that you were aware of what an article history was? It seems like you're an experienced user who's chosen to use an IP for the last 8 edits, but there was nothing in your edits or your first post here that would have indicated that to any reader. ("Geolocate my IP" indicates familiarity with the Internet but not necessarily with Wikis.) Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:12, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I came across a bit rash, I know you were just trying to help. It just didn't address my main issue. You're correct in that these are my first few edits (and probably also last ones for now), I just tried to read up on how things work around here first. Anyway, anyone who deems him/herself to have some authority is free to or not to re-add a maybe less touty sounding version of the information that got removed. I don't have anything else to add, over and out. —The preceding comment was added by 197.220.163.250 (talk • contribs)


 * That listing looks OK to me. Other opinions? Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)