Talk:Warsaw/Bemowo

Related to...
Ive removed the related to poland and warsaw template from this article, as that's not what the related to template is for. Project:Related articles says that they should be used for loose relationships, so a link to a travel topic or an itinerary would be fine - the polish phrasebook's a great idea (thought of that one myself on warsaw :P) - but links to the city and country that it's in isn't really. The breadcrumb navigation at the top of the screen is what that's for. I will remove them from the other districts aswell. (WT-en) Tim 18:47, 16 August 2006 (EDT)
 * Ok, no prob. I didn't know that, thanks for the explanation. (WT-en) CandleWithHare 18:51, 16 August 2006 (EDT)
 * No problem at all. The districts are looking pretty good! One thing you might want to do is to set the various maps to thumbnail size - just add |thumb| into the image box to do that. That way it would leave more space on the page for the information and shouldn't shunt all the edit tabs together and overrun the district box at the bottom. If people want to see the maps big they can just click on the thumb and it pops up bigger. It would also leave some space to get some decent photos in! However, it's up to you if you want to do it! (WT-en) Tim 18:57, 16 August 2006 (EDT)
 * Thanks! I've noticed the problem but I'd wait to see if it disappears when there is some text in the sections. It'd be best if the second map could be kept to be readable. (WT-en) CandleWithHare 19:22, 16 August 2006 (EDT)

This is weird....
Why is there a table of contents? And why is it at the bottom of the page? Hobbitschuster (talk) 17:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * fixed. ויקיג&#39;אנקי (talk) 18:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. There is currently (again) a discussion about districts over at talk:Warsaw Maybe you want to weigh in... Hobbitschuster (talk) 18:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)