Talk:Victor Harbour

Deletion nomination
This is a spelling mistake, because technically Victor Harbor is spelled as "harbor", not "harbour". SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 02:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Given that it's in Australia, most people would expect the Commonwealth spelling, so the redirect seems appropriate and prudent. Nelson Ricardo 2500 (talk) 02:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Also an FYI, but my pageviews tool says it only has one pageview over the last 365 days. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 02:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Doesn't matter. No reason to delete. Keep as a redirect. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per Ikan Kekek. Pageviews has no bearing on whether an article is kept whatsoever. We could theoretically have very popular articles on topics that out of scope for a travel guide while there are still many travel destinations which unfortunately hardly get any views because because of the SEO setback we're still facing 8 years post-fork. Gizza ( roam ) 04:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 12:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. 1. A perfectly good redirect. 2. Per policy - "As a general rule redirection pages should not be deleted." Please reflect on the policy before nominating more redirects for deletion. Nurg (talk) 05:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * So Nurg, per "A perfectly good redirect", are you saying a spelling mistake is a perfectly good redirect? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 06:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Come on, now! You really think this is an unlikely spelling? Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Reasonably likely spelling. No benefit to delete has been identified. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk  |  contributions ) 09:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Outcome: Nomination withdrawn. Can't make my argument here. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 10:45, 27 August 2021 (UTC)