Talk:UNESCO World Heritage List (India)

A Commons file used on this page is missing permission
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page is missing permission information and may be deleted: You can see the details at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Valley of flowers National Park, Uttrakhand India..jpg

Feel of article
This feels like a Wikipedia article to me, not a Wikivoyage article. Does any other Wikivoyage article have this style and layout? And can we get not to say "sovereign state in South Asia"? That's an encyclopedic description. Sovereignty is not relevant to Wikivoyage, only de facto control. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


 * @Ikan Kekek To the, it's not possible as the description is coming from Wikidata which uses an encyclopedic description. SHB2000 (talk &#124; contribs &#124; meta.wikimedia) 08:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)


 * In that case, can we remove the template from the page? I mean, duh, obviously India is related. I'm astonished that it's not linked at the top of the page, but I still don't like the format of this article one bit and don't consider it a genuine Wikivoyage article, as currently structured. Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)


 * In addition to everything else that feels wrong with this long list, I mean article, having all the images on the left side is absolutely not Wikivoyage-style. Also, see Image policy. Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:03, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ? SHB2000 (talk &#124; contribs &#124; meta.wikimedia) 12:10, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Removed. SHB2000 (talk &#124; contribs &#124; meta.wikimedia) 12:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Now, can we please fundamentally restructure this article? The list in two columns should be removed; we need to get rid of that "PREV/TOP/NEXT" template (where did that come from?); unjustify the photos that are currently justified right; put the links in the descriptive prose instead of the captions, which should be shortened; decrease the number of images per WV:Image policy, and unjustify the text which is currently justified center. I may have left something out. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Did a mass revision of the complete page - no PREV/TOP/NEXT - turned text to Markers - cut images by 2/3's - images to left - some textual changes - linked text box removed at beginning of page -- Matroc (talk) 00:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it looks much better. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I did a bit more, but it could still use work. Pashley (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

List out of date
According to https://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/in it seems that there have been new sites from Idea inscribed on the world heritage list. I would ideally update it myself, but I don't know India too well to do the descriptions. Pinging. -- SHB2000 (talk &#124; contribs &#124; meta.wikimedia) 07:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @SHB2000, Okay, I will do it. 2006nishan178713t@lk 08:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for volunteering. SHB2000 (talk &#124; contribs &#124; meta.wikimedia) 09:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * There have been 4 new additions in total-
 * Dholavira: a Harappan City (2021)
 * Historic City of Ahmadabad (2017)
 * Jaipur City, Rajasthan (2019)
 * Kakatiya Rudreshwara (Ramappa) Temple, Telangana (2021)
 * -- 2006nishan178713t@lk 09:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ 2006nishan178713t@lk 11:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update. As India has many cultural wonders with 40 on the tentative list, there is a possibility that this could go out of date, but I will try and remember to update this in August (?) if there are any new sites in India that become inscribed as a world heritage site. SHB2000 (talk &#124; contribs &#124; meta.wikimedia) 07:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yep! 2006nishan178713t@lk 08:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)