Talk:Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve

Comments
Before I launch myself into this, I want to gain consensus that it is an article. I don't see any opportunity to legally sleep in Timucuan. On the other hand, it is a complex destination perhaps not easily covered in the Jacksonville article. (WT-en) OldPine 15:42, 6 September 2008 (EDT)


 * There have been similar discussions with Chimney Rock National Historic Site and others. I think that the final consensus was that if you can sleep there it gets its own article.  If you can't sleep there then there should be the possibility that the article can become at least "usable" status.  I don't know anything about this particular preserve, but if that possibility exists then having its own article should be fine. -- (WT-en) Ryan &bull; (talk) &bull; 15:48, 6 September 2008 (EDT)