Talk:Tân Thành

As of 10:53 UTC, the default banner is not showing at the top of the page, even though Pagebanner default.jpg is in the banner template. Does anyone know why this is the case? --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 10:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * It is being controlled from Wikidata. If default defined locally but a pagebanner is defined on the Wikidata object, this will be used. I have change the image defined at Wikidata as this is used on a number of languages. --Traveler100 (talk) 11:21, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Excellent. Thanks for that! --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 11:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Why has this been recreated?
I blanked and redirected it little more than a week ago, because it has sat empty since March 2018, and here it is back again as an empty outline. This is the sort of thing we usually class as page-creation vandalism, so unless you commit here and now to expanding this into a worthwhile article, I am going to redirect it again to Southern Vietnam,  and protect it from further attempts to recreate it without purpose. I'll be back in 24 hours from now to do so unless there's a reply from you. --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 09:32, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The following will also be considered: Sa Đéc, Vi Thanh, Bac Lieu, Cao Lãnh and Ba Ria. --Traveler100 (talk) 10:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, gosh, yes. I agree totally. It's not good enough to just create an empty page and hope that someone else will do all the work of making it into an article.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 11:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

✅. Additionally, I have protected the article page from all edits by non-admins for six months; if any user wishes to make a proper go at this article, please post your request here.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Also done for the other articles you linked, though haven't protected those for the time being. I'd like to think that any further edits to those pages will now be productive.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 09:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I really don't see the point in you recreating these article skeletons unless you plan to expand them. By the logic of the argument you gave in the edit summary, we should make all redirects of real places into skeleton articles. That's not supported by policy, in fact it's policy to undo page creation vandalism. --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 10:45, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I have not edited this page? But if I did I would make it a disambiguation page. --Traveler100 (talk) 10:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)


 * In the past hour, I have received four notifications from you undoing my merging of skeleton articles in Southern Vietnam, and they are now back as skeleton articles, not disambiguations.


 * Though of course this is not one of them. I'm not sure how I ended up on this page, as I thought I'd just clicked on the notification and got to the right talk page. --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 11:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Recreated as they were existing links on a region page and need to complete the list of main cities of each province in South Vietnam. --Traveler100 (talk) 11:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)