Talk:Sydney/Darling Harbour

Most of the recent additions to this page are out of line with the Attraction listings style guide -- don't front link attractions... --(WT-en) Hypatia


 * See Project:External links/Links in listings for thoughts on this change. -- (WT-en) Chris j wood 20:53, 5 Aug 2004 (EDT)


 * Those thoughts aren't official yet and the current listing style is with end-links. --(WT-en) Evan 00:44, 6 Aug 2004 (EDT)

I've removed the stub message --(WT-en) Hypatia


 * Still reckon that end-listing is cumbersome and unnecessary..... Isn't that why external links appear in green and internal links appear in blue? (WT-en) Pjamescowie 05:06, 6 Aug 2004 (EDT)


 * I don't like it much either, but I'll stick with it while the style guide has that form. -- (WT-en) Hypatia 05:41, 6 Aug 2004 (EDT)

In a totally different discussion, I haven't actually been to any of the places I list in this area, so others should modify the descriptions to be more informative -- (WT-en) Hypatia 17:10, 6 Aug 2004 (EDT)

good work
good work to all of you who've contributed to this page. it's really awesome. the powerhouse museum seems neat. keep smiling, (WT-en) ee talk 18:42, 10 November 2008 (EST).

Change Static map to dynamic map?
Darling Harbour had a significant change this year when the monorail was removed. It is still however reflected on the static map of this article.

Is someone willing to ammend the SVG of the static map? If not then we should change to the dynamic map for accuracy. --Andrewssi2 (talk) 11:01, 8 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I did the static map originally, and I'm happy to update it if required, but I think the dynamic map would be better. I've done a fair bit of updates to the OSM map with the demolition of the Exhibition Centre, that isn't reflected in the static map.  --Inas (talk) 02:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I would actually completely agree. I just didn't want to step on anyone's toes if they would have been prepared to update the static map.
 * We can change to dynamic. Andrewssi2 (talk) 03:11, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Here is the original for future reference, should someone want to go back to static. --Andrewssi2 (talk) 06:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)