Talk:Supraśl

Merge to Białystok
I doubt there is enough content for this article to stand on its own. Supraśl is considered part of Białystok agglomeration and anyway Białystok article needs more content. Jjtkk (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Supraśl is a good 15 kilometres out of Białystok and very much a separate town, but I am not really happy with the proliferation of empty articles that give the impression that Wikivoyage is not a good information source. If you do not have enough information or willpower to beef this article up with content, how about redirecting this article back to Podlaskie and perhaps mentioning Supraśl in Białystok without a link for the time being?
 * If Białystok needs more content, than it'd better be content about Białystok. It is not as if the whole city was already covered well by the article and we need to merge other towns in for it to look good. PrinceGloria (talk) 09:11, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was thinking of writing a sentence in Białystok. Then redirecting this article there would make more sense than to Podlaskie. Jjtkk (talk) 09:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Oppose - I would leave it as a separate article. Ajh1492 (talk) 19:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Any other thoughts on this one? It's been sitting around for months now... Texugo (talk) 18:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect if the article isn't going to grow. If it's reasonably close to Bialystok, put it in Bialystok's Go next section, otherwise in Podlaskie. ϒpsilon (talk) 19:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)