Talk:Sukhumvit

Necessary?
Might I suggest a routebox be made for this instead of a disambiguation? We don't normally have route articles unless they are a fleshed-out itinerary... (WT-en) Texugo 11:57, 30 August 2010 (EDT)


 * Hm, well. A routebox you're right is a good idea. But for me, "Sukhumvit" mostly refers to the Sukhumvit district in Bangkok. But I realized making a redirect to Bangkok/Sukhumvit would be wrong as the road is longer than Bangkok alone. That's why I did it this way. I never intended this as being a route article, just as a disamb of a neighborhood, similar to Rattanakosin. But removing the disamb is fine by me. --(WT-en) globe-trotter 15:10, 30 August 2010 (EDT)