Talk:Southern Karnataka

Is this neccessary?
After reading the introductory statement to this article, I asked myself, is this really neccessary? However, before putting it up for deletion, I thought maybe I just didn't understand the region well enough to make that call.

It comes across to me like something is being divided too much. I'm from Tennessee, but I don't believe see anyone dividing it into West, Central, and East even though those regions are occasionally referred to. Is an article about the southern part of the state of Karnataka something that is going to highly useful to a traveller? Or could all of its information simply be compiled in the entire state's article?

So can someone that is more familiar help me out?

Thanks!

-- (WT-en) Ilkirk 17:28, 11 Oct 2005 (EDT)


 * Tennessee has 5.6 million people, Karnataka has 55.8 million. You do the math. (WT-en) Jpatokal 21:05, 11 Oct 2005 (EDT)


 * That's what I needed! Thank you. :)  Now, is that on a page here and I missed it, or does it need to be added?  -- (WT-en) Ilkirk 00:20, 12 Oct 2005 (EDT)