Talk:San Diego/San Ysidro

status
What's needed for usable? Hobbitschuster (talk) 21:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * See City_guide_status. If we had something in See and/or Do I think this article would be usable.JakeOregon (talk) 02:44, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Busiest border crossing claim
So an anonymous IP removed a certain hedging of the "busiest border crossing" claim with an edit summary that includes "fuck off". What should we do about this? I think the point that Schengen borders have nobody counting the crossings remains valid... Hobbitschuster (talk) 16:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

San Ysidro
So an IP editor wrote this (also look at the delightful edit summary). Can somebody other than me try to find an accurate and fair wording? I just don't want to get into a fight with that IP over this... Edited to add: The contributions of the IP editor seem to indicate that a rougher tone is employed by said user quite often... —The preceding comment was added by Hobbitschuster (talk • contribs)


 * Already addressed at User talk:174.24.248.41. Let's wait and see what happens next. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * There are some cases where a user might benefit from being counseled because s/he doesn't know how s/he comes off. This isn't one of those cases. I would have no compunction about giving this user the escalating-blocks treatment if this kind of blatantly uncivil behavior continues. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 00:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Right, one warning and then blocks if needed. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)