Talk:Salt Lake City/Temple Square

Does Temple Square really need its own page, or should this be moved to just "Downtown" or something? (WT-en) Jpatokal 21:28, 15 Nov 2004 (EST)

its own article
I know that when working on wikipedia they suggest a new article for almost everything. While it is part of Salt Lake City it is its own unique attraction and place. Having it in its own article allows people to access it using the search function and keeps the salt lake page from having copious amounts of data on it. Also all the regular categories listed on the travel pages; get in, get out, get around all have specific answers that are different than the salt lake page.(WT-en) Biodrin 17:42, 17 Nov 2004 (EST)

Merge and Redirect
Look, Temple Square is a big attraction, but it has no place being an article of its own. I can see it as a sub-section of Salt Lake City, but definitely not its own article. Salt Lake City does not have enough content yet to warrant breaking it down into districts, and Temple Square isn't even a district. If search function is a concern, we can redirect it to SLC, and any searches for "temple square" will just go there.

Unless anyone has any objections, I'm going to merge and redirect. (WT-en) PerryPlanet Talk 16:09, 4 December 2009 (EST)