Talk:Religious destinations of Kerala

What is this?
I don't think this is really a travel topic, but more a list of churches. They aren't actually "pilgrimages" as the article states, but just churches or temples or mosques to visit, all slapped together on one page. Shouldn't these things be covered in their respective destination articles? I can't think of any reason why all of this should be grouped together here in one pile. There is no special reason why Kerala needs to have a list-article-type approach to this. (WT-en) texugo 11:36, 31 October 2011 (EDT)


 * I think parts of it should be merged into Sacred sites of the Indian sub-continent, most of the rest to destination articles, perhaps some just scrapped. I have not inserted a merge tag yet, thought it better to seek other opinions first. Pashley (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I would support what Texugo suggested above. --Saqib (talk) 17:57, 8 December 2013 (UTC)


 * What should be done? Merged into the other articles as Pashley suggested? --Andrewssi2 (talk) 00:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Sure. If you'd like to merge the material into other articles, by all means go ahead, and then redirect the article when you're done. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I see a merge tag was placed on this article, but the problem is, the merge tag suggests merging the article into Kerala. The Kerala article is already too long, and specific entries like these don't belong there, anyway. Instead, what should be done was suggested by Texugo and Pashley above. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * That's the idea. I tried various strategies of trying to make the merge tag show something other than a link to a single article, and even considering substituting the template and manually changing what it says. Perhaps we need a dismantle tag? Texugo (talk) 01:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)