Talk:Puʻuhonua o Hōnaunau National Historical Park

Comments
Ooops... got this all done and then realized there is no sleeping allowed in the Park. That is a primary guideline for what gets an article. Maybe this should have been put under the town? It does list National Parks as something that gets an article at Project:What is an article?. (WT-en) OldPine 19:21, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
 * I think this looks fine as a stand-alone article. It would be a pretty huge Do or Get out. Others may disagree though ;-) (WT-en) Maj 08:40, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
 * This is a tricky one. On one hand, I've been there and I can tell you it is quite small (you can see the whole park within a few hours). However, it seems like there's too much to just be a Do or Get out listing, and it's too far from a city or town with its own article. So I think giving this park its own article will be okay, at least for now. (WT-en) PerryPlanet 21:34, 13 June 2007 (EDT)
 * We're quite inconsistent in our handling of United States National Parks, but to the extent that there is a policy, it seems to "allow" for creation of articles for places like this, although it doesn't "require" them (as it does for parks where you really can sleep). It's been a while since I've been to this park, but my memory of it doesn't include a full-service town nearby, so I'd say leave the article in place, at least for now. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 23:01, 13 June 2007 (EDT)