Talk:Pakil

''A vote for deletion discussion is archived below. The result was Keep.'' JamesA  >talk 14:01, 30 September 2012 (CEST)

Pakil
An encyclopedic article. --Saqib (talk) 19:56, 26 September 2012 (CEST)


 * Keep. While this is (almost?) completely copied from Wikipedia, it seems to be a legitimate destination, in which case the article needs a re-write as a travel guide (and a template) rather than getting deleted. Vidimian (talk) 20:24, 26 September 2012 (CEST)
 * Withdraw my nomination. I learnt that articles of legitimate destinations are not meant for deletion. --Saqib (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2012 (CEST)


 * Keep. Valid article. I have removed the copy-pasted content and added an article template. --Globe-trotter (talk) 20:44, 26 September 2012 (CEST)
 * Then please archive this (now) redundant nomination to prevent confusion --W. Franke-mailtalk 13:55, 30 September 2012 (CEST)