Talk:Old Oyo National Park

Feedback
- Hey there, here's just some suggestions for you to improve this:
 * Split up the see and do
 * Fill in the eat and buy
 * Remove the things about mobile phone operators

If these are done, I'll upgrade this to a usable and if it's really good, then I might upgrade it to guide. All the best. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 03:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * working in it Edriiic (talk) 06:37, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yep. I'm promoting it to usable now. Congrats now, as I think this is your second? (or third) usable article, and our second usable article of a Nigerian National Park on Wikivoyage. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 07:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Although to promote it to a guide, all that's needed is a better get in (as it is blank now), and some other minor things. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 07:36, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I just worked on the 'Get In' section, hope it's suitable now.Edriiic (talk) 07:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Looking good now, although there's only two things left to upgrade it:

===Lodging=== ===Camping=== ===Backcountry===
 * 1) There needs to be a custom pagebanner. - I can't find any images on commons though
 * 2) Sleep needs to have three separate sections:


 * If there aren't any certain types of "sleep" locations in any one of these areas. Just write that there's no place for xxx and if there's a reason, just list it.


 * --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 08:09, 19 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I have added those sections you stated. It's such a bummer that there are no pictures on wiki commons. Will try and get a picture and ping you when I have one.Edriiic (talk) 08:34, 19 June 2021 (UTC)


 * - yeah, looked onto flickr, and noticed that there were only 5 images with "All rights reserved" which means we can't use it. I think this is ready, but Park article status says the following is needed for a guide:

Gives you different choices for which parts of the park to visit, and information on multiple attractions and things to do. Listings and layout closely match the manual of style. There are clear explanations of multiple ways to get in, multiple accommodation listings (if applicable), clear information on getting around, and some suggestions for where to go next, with one-liner descriptions. Should have a custom page-banner.
 * But for this, I'd like to hear the opinion from another editor - anyone that's not us. But apart from that, looking good :) SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 11:20, 19 June 2021 (UTC)