Talk:Nan

I removed this entry from the See section. I think it is entirely too much info. The same is true to a lesser extent of the ones I left intact in the See section. If you think I am in error, put this back. Otherwise I will continue pruning the section.



Seligne (talk) 14:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I think the content of the listing is entirely adequate. This is one of Nan's main sight and it is noted for its Buddha statues and murals, so these artworks should be described in detail. This is the normal degree of detail for a city's main sight. Printed travel guides sometimes dedicate several pages to a city's main sight (e.g. St Peter's Basilica in Rome or the Louvre in Paris...) --RJFF (talk) 13:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


 * I just reverted your latest edit. I take no position in this argument except that you need to come to a consensus. Edit warring is untenable on a site that anyone can edit. See if you can either come to a compromise or get a lot of support for your position. I will say that purely from a visual standpoint, if you do need to devote a lot of lines to describing the wat, you should break it up into paragraphs or subsections, and that could mean using a subsection of "See", rather than a listing template. A big wall of black text is not user-friendly. Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Good point. What do you think about this proposal? --RJFF (talk) 14:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

If RJFF thinks it is that important perhaps others do too. So I yield to his judgement. Seligne (talk) 15:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)