Talk:Moscow/Central

Church listings with no content
As highlighted by User:Atsirlin, this page has a lot of churches listed with no content whatsoever.

Since the contributor has only listed them without taking any time to say why each church should be visited, I propose removing all the listings with no content. Andrewssi2 (talk) 23:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think it will help. I mean, it will not make this travel guide any better. --Alexander (talk) 06:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes it will, even if it is an incrementally small step :) Andrewssi2 (talk) 06:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Actually, I see what you mean. This article is in dire straights indeed. --Andrewssi2 (talk) 06:55, 14 April 2014 (UTC)



Hotel National
This hotel appeared to have two listings, so I removed this one: Is there anything here worth adding to the other listing?

In my opinion, names like the one above should be avoided. "a Luxury Collection Hotel" is marketing fluff & while we might use the city name in "Moscow Hilton", it is not needed here. Pashley (talk) 14:28, 25 January 2023 (UTC)


 * This article (& perhaps others?) have several other names I want to shorten. e.g. To me Moscow/Central seems ridiculous; it should obviously be just "Chekhoff Hotel", perhaps adding Moscow if there's a Chekhoff in Kiev or wherever.
 * Previous discussion at Talk:Grand_old_hotels & things that links to. Pashley (talk) 15:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)