Talk:East Gippsland Rail Trail

East Gippsland Rail Trail
Per the one year rule for itineraries. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 00:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Gippsland? Certainly can't be kept in this condition. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Gippsland is far too big of a region for it to be merged into. It's bigger than Maryland... SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 01:18, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd just like this rail trail to be briefly mentioned somewhere. Where would that be? Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Although can't think of a better place than Gippsland (if East Gippsland were an article then that'd be fine for me). SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 01:22, 18 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge to Gippsland. As the merge target isn’t a bloated article, I don’t see an issue with this. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk  |  contributions ) 13:48, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * While I would usually defer to our Australians on this, I think it would be an awkward fit in Gippsland. I have improved the article, and ask to reconsider. Ground Zero (talk) 22:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * LGTM. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 22:37, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements to the article. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk  |  contributions ) 22:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yep. It's in a practical sense usable now, whether or not it officially meets the "usable" status criteria. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Outcome: Nomination withdrawn as it's usable now. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 03:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)