Talk:Clackmannanshire

Destination articles and Merge with Stirlingshire?
This seems like a very small region. There are a number of red-linked destinations, but do we really need an article for each one? Based on some (admittedly) quick research I did, it seems Clackmannanshire could easily be covered in one article (for the entire shire, it doesn't seem very big) or two articles -- one for Alloa and another for the northern/northeastern part (which the current Dollar article could cover). Which leads to my next question -- should the region be merged into Stirlingshire? This is how Scotland's tourism website seems to handle it, combining Stirlingshire, Falkirk and Clackmannanshire into one region.

If we did merge, I'm not sure if Stiringshire would still be an appropriate name. Possibilities I thought of are: Stirlingshire and the River Forth, or maybe The Forth Valley to keep things short.

Thoughts? -Shaundd (talk) 19:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Tend to agree, will look at the topic in a bit more detail and come back with a few suggestions. --Traveler100 (talk) 19:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The Forth Valley sound like a good name for merging the two counties. Could someone create a region map? --Traveler100 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You mean an updated Central Belt map? I can do that, although it'll probably be the weekend before I can get it up.
 * I like the brevity of "The Forth Valley", although, I think geographically it only covers the southern half of the proposed region. -Shaundd (talk) 06:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)