Talk:Chiang Mai to Chiang Rai in 3 days

Chiang Mai to Chiang Rai in 3 days
Per the one year rule for itineraries. And personal itineraries are not allowed. -- SHB2000 (talk &#124; contribs &#124; meta.wikimedia) 08:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. I think it has too much information for it to be really good to delete it. I also don't care whether an itinerary is "personal" if it could be helpful and describes a reasonable route. I looked at Google Maps for route information. It's not all direct, but there's a certain logic to going uphill, then downhill and repeating the process. I'll say this, too: If a decision is made to delete the article, we should check first to see if any of the content should be merged to the articles for the various places mentioned in it, including their "Go next" sections. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. While I'd say the Understand isn't complete and the route isn't described in detail it seems to me it provides enough of a base for planning your own itinerary (given the itinerary as described is viable). If various Get in and Get around sections on the regions and cities involved cover the route and describe the attractions, it might even be detailed enough as of now (I did not check them, but I doubt). The rule on personal itineraries is for those that stay in a shape where no one can reconstruct what the itinerary really is about, and those that are redundant with just listing the attractions in the cities involved. –LPfi (talk) 12:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep – not yet at usable status, as it's missing a "Get in" section, but has lots of useful information and seems like a promising itinerary article to me. I always thought the phrase "personal itineraries" referred to articles that listed a bunch of attractions in a single destination, not articles about actual itineraries from Point A to Point B with several stops in between. Note that, for instance, Hong Kong to Kunming overland is listed at Itineraries as an appropriate title for an itinerary. —Granger (talk · contribs) 19:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. I would support moving the title to merely Chiang Mai to Chiang Rai in line with our standard for itineraries not to mention time spent traveling in the title. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 23:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Doesn't matter to me. Shorten the title and then state in the lede that a 3-day itinerary is proposed or something. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep The route is detailed and has useful info could easily be promoted to usable by importing get in info from the Chiang Mai article. Tai123.123 (talk) 15:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Outcome: Kept per consensus. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)