Talk:Belfountain

Merge with Caledon (Ontario)?
Not 100% sure I agree that this should be merged with Caledon. Belfountain may not be a separate municipal area, but Caledon itself is made up on little (unofficial) hamlets like this one, and I think grouping them into one might be over-doing it. The way I see it is that Belfountain is its own destination, has its own inns and restaurants etc. What do other people think? I'm not actually strongly tied to this opinion, so if the consensus is to move it it's all good :-) —The preceding comment was added by Mstachowsky (talk • contribs) 13:43, 25 July 2013‎
 * I have removed the merge tag now. Texugo (talk) 14:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Renewed discussion
I agree with User:Traveler100 that this should be merged with Caledon (Ontario), at least until we sort out how to deal with Caledon. Right now, we have a city article (Belfountain) within another city article (Caledon), which isn't consistent with our geographical hierarchy guidelines (I also think it's potentially confusing if we have overlapping articles). We also aren't dealing with the communities within Caledon consistently -- Bolton, a much larger town than Belfountain, was merged into Caledon with this edit back in the summer. For consistency, I think we should either put all of the communities that make up Caledon into one Caledon guide, or leave Belfountain and Bolton as separate guides with no Caledon article. I don't know the area well enough to know what is the right way, and there isn't much content anyway, so I think it's best to merge everything into Caledon for now and see what additional listings it can gather. -Shaundd (talk) 05:08, 4 November 2016 (UTC)