Talk:Antique

Copyright violation?
The "[citation needed]" tag is an obvious artifact of cutting and pasting directly from Wikipedia, but the current version of Antique (province) doesn't have the text in question. However, look at this site. Which way did the plagiarism go - from here (or Wikitravel) to there or from there to here? Evidence suggests that that website is plagiarizing from here, not vice versa. See, for example, http://www.davishunter.com/home/place/United%20States%20of%20America vs. United States of America, http://www.davishunter.com/home/place/Rochester%20%28New%20York%29 vs. Rochester (New York), http://www.davishunter.com/home/place/Denver vs. Denver - in short, the evidence of them plagiarizing us or Wikitravel is obvious, incontrovertible and troubling. So I think we can forget about correspondences between this article and that article reflecting on this article. But that still leaves the question of what to do about the problematic "Cities" section of this article. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)