Talk:Animal ethics

Purpose of article?
Is this really a travel topic? I understand that animal welfare should be a consideration for travelers, but the way the article is currently written looks more like an attempt at animal welfare activism than impartial advice on this subject. --Andrewssi2 (talk) 23:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The purpose of the article is to provide a simple ethical checklist from a travel guide context; the recent additions seem to be excessive. The quote about Sea World looks like a false accusation; when I was at Sea World, there was no seafood on the menu. /Yvwv (talk) 03:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks, the list you removed was basically a list of things some people (myself included for most items) don't like, but just not travel relevant and made the article's purpose really confusing.
 * The Seaworld quote was also off the mark. Even had it been correct then I still don't see its relevance. Andrewssi2 (talk) 03:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The Seaworld quote is a joke, attributed to a comedienne. K7L (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)