Talk:4 Days in Walt Disney World on a Budget

VFD discussion
This is a redirect to WDW nowadays, but had a brief history as an article. I don't believe there are any copyright reasons for retaining it, since when it was redirected, Texugo wrote "I don't see much of anything that needs merging". What does anyone else think? --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 16:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * As long as there are no copyright issues, I'd agree to delete. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk | contributions ) 16:28, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * As we don't allow personal itineraries, because can be an infinite combination of them, I don't see why there needs to be "random" redirects like this. Delete. -- ϒψιλον (talk ) 17:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If nothing was merged, there's no real need for this redirect, but I don't understand why there's a reason to delete this redirect, and I would oppose deletion unless Texugo stops by to affirm that nothing whatsoever was merged. My feeling is that spending any time discussing a redirect that indeed does no harm is per se a detriment to the site, because there's really no benefit to the discussion nor to the proposed deletion. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. There may be incoming links to the now redirected article. Thus deleting any meaningful article that has existed for substantial time is a no-no, unless there are severe reasons for deletion. Former articles are usually also of some historic interest. And, if a redirect causes no harm, taking it to discussion here causes more harm than letting it alone.  This article was rather short-lived, one month, so I am not going to fight for it though. --LPfi (talk) 16:45, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I just checked & the only link is from this page. I do not know if there were no others to begin with or if, as is the usual procedure, whoever did the redirect found & fixed any problematic links. Pashley (talk) 18:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I assume LPfi's point is incoming links from other websites, not from within Wikivoyage. Keep on that basis. —Granger (talk · contribs) 00:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm still not convinced, but as User:Ikan Kekek says, "there's really no benefit to the discussion nor to the proposed deletion", so I'm not going to explain my reasons. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk | contributions ) 01:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment: tomorrow, there will have 14 days with this nomination. Since there's no consensus, I think we should leave a total of 21 days for this one per policy. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk | contributions ) 13:35, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Seriously? I'd rather spend less time discussing this, not more. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's actually a good point. What do you think we should do, then? I personally don't mind if we keep or delete, and I doubt anyone else who's voted really cares &mdash; the discussion is not very important because it's a redirect, not an article. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk | contributions ) 17:18, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and move on. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Result: kept. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk | contributions ) 11:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)