File talk:Orbetello Panoramica small.jpg

Image:Orbetello Argentario.jpg and others
The following uploads by a single contributor are nominated:
 * Image:Orbetello Argentario.jpg
 * Image:Mura Levante Porto.jpg
 * Image:Feniglia.jpg
 * Image:Mulino Laguna.jpg
 * Image:Laguna Tramonto.jpg
 * Image:Museo Guzman.jpg
 * Image:Frontone di Talamone part.jpg
 * Image:Anguille Eels.jpg
 * Image:Orbetello Panoramica small.jpg


 * Delete. Proper attribution (including photographer and copyright holder) is not provided though uploader claims that these are licensed under cc-bysa.  Unless he owns a Satellite, he didn't take them all himself, so he needs to explain why these are copyable.  All photos uploaded appear in a photo gallery at Yahoo Italy linked to from the city's website. No information about copyrights is given in the photo gallery.  So unless the contributor has more information about these, I would guess he misunderstood copyright and we should delete these. -- (WT-en) Colin 02:56, 28 January 2007 (EST)


 * Keep. Of course, the first picture is taken from satellite, is one of those you can easily find all over the web and I made some changes on it with photoshop. I really don't know whether anyone can hold rights on such a picture. The other pictures are mine and I provided them to the photogallery you mentioned and I set them as free to use. As you can see, some of them are used also in the web site of Comune di Orbetello, but they simply use them and don't hold any other rights on them -- (WT-en) Pino Fusi 10:14, 29 January 2007 (EST)


 * Keep all except Image:Orbetello Argentario.jpg based on that explanation. Delete that one, since I think satellite photos can have copyright.  -- (WT-en) Jonboy 11:10, 30 January 2007 (EST)


 * What Jonboy voted. Satellite photos definitely can be copyrighted (read the watermarks on Google Earth; Google has paid some big bucks for he rights to use some of these images), so unless you can establish that the image is public domain (such as those coming from NASA), we have to assume it is not. - (WT-en) Todd VerBeek 10:45, 14 February 2007 (EST)
 * This looks right to me. I've deleted the satellite photo, but it appears that the others can stay unless there's evidence to the contrary. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 10:23, 15 February 2007 (EST)