File talk:Clevelandskyline.jpg

vfd discussion

 * Delete. Copyright holder uploaded the image, however, does not give Wikivoyage explicit (or at the very least vague) permission to use the image, which is located on the Cleveland article. (WT-en) Sapphire 03:35, 4 April 2006 (EDT)
 * Hold off on deleting (i.e., no "speedy delete") pending conversation with the copyright holder. It looks like she simply assumed that asserting copyright here constituted release.  User:(WT-en) Andromeda321 hasn't been around for a while, but I dropped her a note about this on her corresponding WP page; let's see if she responds.  (I see that (WT-en)  Ryan had done something similar on her WT page.)  BTW, she uploaded other images here with the same language, and presumably the same issues. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 09:52, 4 April 2006 (EDT)
 * You know, the upload page does a rather poor job of explaining what's expected of photo contributors, referring to a non-existent checkbox to affirm you have permission to upload it, and saying nothing about making a license declaration. To most people, uploading it and stating that you created it would seem explicit enough. - (WT-en) Todd VerBeek 11:20, 4 April 2006 (EDT)
 * Keep. See User talk:(WT-en) Wrh2/Archive for a response indicating that the user intended the image to be released for use here, even if it's not explicitly stated on the image page.  I very much agree with (WT-en) Todd that the image upload page needs to clearly tell uploaders what text to put on the image page, but that discussion should probably occur on Project:Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan 14:49, 4 April 2006 (EDT)
 * Comment: I added on a release under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike to this image and will go through the rest of my other uploaded images to do the same. Hope that will suffice.  I will say though that Todd's comment is pretty on spot: when I uploaded the images it seemed enough to just say that I created the image, and a lot of the images I randomly looked at before uploading seemed to support this (by having minimal to no release info, just who made the image).  It might be worth looking into adding something more explicit to the update page as I'm sure I'm not the only one who assumed this. (WT-en) Andromeda321 16:11, 4 April 2006 (EDT)